- #I7 2600k overclock geekbench 4 1080p#
- #I7 2600k overclock geekbench 4 update#
- #I7 2600k overclock geekbench 4 upgrade#
Generationally, the 4790K ends up at 218FPS AVG, a marked gain over the 2600K. It’s still perfectly capable in this particular title, although may be limiting for anyone who can see a difference at 200Hz. It’s performing behind the R5 1600 stock CPU as well, although we must give credit to the 2600K for keeping up for this long.
#I7 2600k overclock geekbench 4 1080p#
This one tends to push extremely high framerates, even at 1080p resolutions.įor 1080p and High settings, we tracked F1 2018 as hitting 165FPS AVG on the i7-2600K stock CPU, putting the once-king i7-2600K about on-par with the R圜PU overclocked to 3.9GHz. Using the EGO engine by CodeMasters, F1 2018 offers a strong representation of some of the most common racing games available. PresentMon is used for framerate data logging, with custom scripts for capturing data accurately.
#I7 2600k overclock geekbench 4 update#
Windows 10 version 1803 was used for all testing with Windows Update disabled. All quad-channel HEDT platforms: 4x 8GB 3200MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX 16-18-18-36 DDR4.(Exception: Z97X uses HyperX Savage 2133MHz DDR3).All desktop platforms: 2x 8GB 3200MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX 16-18-18-36 DDR4.MSI GD65 Z77 w/ HyperX Savage DDR3 32GB 2166MHz (max supported).Motherboards used for testing are as follows: Tested CPUs primarily include the below list: For anyone with a 2700K, it’s mostly the same thing, just 100MHz faster. These 2018 i7-2600K benchmarks compare against Ryzen (R7 2700 and others), the i7-8700K, and the i9-9900K, alongside several other CPUs. For everyone still on Sandy Bridge and the i7-2600K (or i7-2700K), we wanted to revisit the CPUs and benchmark them in 2018. Intel made tremendous gains over Nehalem and hasn’t quite recaptured that level of per-core increase since. Sandy Bridge launched and has remained a well-respected, nearly idolized CPU since its launch. This launch followed Nehalem, which challenged the Phenom II X6’s appeal in a heated market. The 2600K CPU was manufactured starting around 2009-2010, launching alongside the Intel Sandy Bridge 2nd Gen Core i-Series of CPUs. Our original Intel i7-2600K revisit (2017) can be found here, but we had a completely different test methodology at the time.
#I7 2600k overclock geekbench 4 upgrade#
We revisited these CPUs last year, but wanted to come back around to the 2600K in 2018 to see if it’s finally time to upgrade for hangers-on to the once-king CPU.
The 2600K was a soldered CPU with significant performance uplift over Nehalem 930s, and launched when AMD’s Phenom II X6 CPUs were already embattled with the previous Intel architecture. I really would have wanted to see the same suit of tests at the same clocks - preferably with memory at the same transfer rate too, as they had 2600K with DDR3-2400 that should not be too difficult.The Intel i7-2600K is arguably one of the most iconic products released by Intel in the last decade, following-up the seminal Nehalem CPUs with major architectural improvements in Sandy Bridge. When comparing results, these are the frequencies tested CPUs run at - normal/boost, most multithreaded loads including games are more likely running at normal clocks: According to Siliconlottery tests, most (75+%) of 7700K and 9700K OC to 5.0 GHz and practically all to 4.9GHz. Yes, OCd 2600K brings the difference down by a lot but when comparing that also consider 7700k and 9700k are no slouches for overclocking either. 30%+ at 1080p is even more noteworthy difference but I think Anandtech tested 1080p with medium or low. Even more so considering this was tested with GTX1080 that runs fast out of steam at 1440p. With regards to gaming, 18% increase with 9700K or 14% with 7700K at 1440p is not something to disregard.
0 kommentar(er)
